Godwin’s Constitution

Hitler Card


The latest blog posting of a man — a criminal defense lawyer — whose opinions I very much respect, even if the feeling does not appear to be mutual, and (Scott says this isn’t true, so I’m crossing it out) even though I sometimes disagree with his opinions, inspires today’s blog post here. He appears to draw a connection between complaints “addressing any aspect of our fragile criminal justice system” that lead to some statement that “we live in a police state, our elected officials are tyrants and the Constitution is dead” and what he calls another corollary — Corollary 92 — of Godwin’s Law.

As with his statement that “it’s wrong,” I can find no support for calling it Corollary 92, but at least the latter claim is funny.

The former — plus the claim that it is “unhelpful” to make such statements — is not only unconvincing because similarly unsupported, but demonstrates why the mere statement of Godwin’s Law itself should not be considered the talisman it has become for discounting those with whom we disagree.

Since I am one of those who frequently claims that the Constitution is dead and since I think the position stated above is the one which is unhelpful, and even harmful, it is only fair that I respond.

[Read more...]


How Police States Are Born


It’s amazing how often history reports itself in things both small and large. 

I recently ran across one of the small things in this passage from Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here:

“Remember our war hysteria, when we called sauerkraut ‘Liberty cabbage’ and somebody actually proposed calling German measles ‘Liberty measles’?”  (Sinclair Lewis, It Can’t Happen Here (2005 ed.) p. 17, originally published in 1935.)

Can I interest you in some “freedom fries”

[Read more...]


Goose-stepping Our Way to the Fourth Reich


Over on my other blog — I maintain FresnoCriminalDefense.com as my website and blog relating to more regional issues specific to my Fresno criminal defense office — I had the chance to respond to one of my readers who complained, among other things, that I was not being fair to law enforcement officers because I made allusions to the similarities between them and the enforcers of totalitarianism in Nazi Germany.

The timing could not have been more perfect.

[Read more...]


Encouraging Police States


A CNN legal analyst today comments on a Secret Service agent who told a citizen to delete pictures taken of a sports stadium because there happened to be a security checkpoint out front. She correctly notes that the Secret Service cannot legally order a citizen to delete the images. She also points out that the Secret Service confirmed that they cannot order citizens to delete pictures.

(USAToday quotes a Secret Service spokesperson as saying the agents “were certainly within their rights.” And WUSA9 news quotes them as saying they “have the authority to ask them to remove the picture from the camera.” However, as the Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area notes, there is no law that allows law enforcement to do this. Note that the Secret Service spokesperson said they had the authority or “right” to “ask.”)

The CNN Legal Analyst then goes on to state that “your job” as a citizen when you encounter a law enforcement officer is to make the encounter as pleasant and short as possible. That’s your job. You are responsible for making sure that your encounter with the State and to make sure the State stays happy. She notes that if a citizen refused to delete the images, “your investigation has been elevated and you’re in a lot of trouble.” Even though the Secret Service has no legal justification to override your rights as a citizen.

The attitude expressed by this CNN analyst partly explains why America is rapidly becoming a dictatorial police state. We aren’t — yet, anyway — an actual dictatorship. We still nominally have an elected president. But we have already reached the point where every officer of the State, no matter how low his or her rank, can arbitrarily restrict the rights of citizens, even when the law favors the citizen and not the desires of the individual officer.

Frankly, when even our legally-trained analysts say things like this CNN analyst said, we deserve it.

Stand up for your rights, or lose them. Benjamin Franklin, one of our nation’s Founders, said, “Sell not…Liberty to purchase Power.” (You usually see this written as, “Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”)