The Shame of the Juvenile Court
Friday, February 19th, 2010A judge whom I consider a good man — and who I believe I would be pleased to call my friend if ever that were possible — nevertheless lost his temper with me recently during an off-the-record discussion. The subject of the discussion and the way the court lost its temper is why I had to write this post.
Two things should be noted before I “get into it.” First, whether the court or anyone else believes me on this, I’m writing this because a driving force in my life is the Jewish concept of tikkun olam. In other words, I want to work cooperatively to leave the world a better place than it was when I arrived. If I can’t do it cooperatively, though, I will nevertheless work to do it.
The second thing is the corollary to that desire: I’m not writing this to further anger the judge (though given the court’s refusal to give serious consideration to this issue, that may be a sadly unavoidable side effect of my comments). Rather, I wish to explain what I was unable to say due to the chilling effect of the court’s reaction to my off-the-record comment — and to the fact that others had started to filter into the courtroom. I’m hopeful — since I know some judges read my blog — that this post might help explain why it is the right for the court to change its position on this one issue, and why it should be ashamed if it does not.
So what were we talking about? And what did I say that so enraged one of the few judges I would love to be able to call my friend?
