A storm has been brewing in San Diego for awhile now, whipping up waves of opinion concerning gang charges.
The facts are these: A group of five guys were out drinking one night at a bar. Another guy accidentally bumps one of them and spills beer on him. The lone guy decides maybe he should leave before something bad happens.
The five bandidos — they called themselves the Bird Rock Bandits — follow him out of the bar and, apparently, to the front door of his house, where they confront him. They challenge him to a fight and, when he starts to get the upper hand against one of their homies, he is sucker-punched by their leader. The sucker punch knocks him unconscious. He falls back, hits his head on the pavement and four days later he dies at the hospital.
After the guy dies and the five gang members are arrested, other people come forward to talk about how they, too, had been assaulted by the Bird Rock Bandits.
As In Cold Blog reported,
Accusations include throwing punches that break facial bones, requiring surgery; intimidating people with violence and threatening to kill them; accosting beachgoers; crashing parties in a chartered bus, beating up guests and even hitting young women who get in their way.
Sounds like their primary activities are assaults by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, threats to commit crimes resulting in death or great bodily injury as defined in Section 422, — at the very least. As if that wasn’t enough,
A gang expert told a judge Tuesday that members of the so-called Bird Rock Bandits had the same gang colors as the Hell’s Angels and wanted to associate with the infamous motorcycle gang.
Apparently, the gang was also known to throw signs.
One expert witness, an investigator for the San Diego District Attorney’s office, said the Bird Rock Bandits showed all the characteristics of a gang including claiming a territory, displaying hand signals, the use of gang defining colors, and most importantly, ongoing criminal activity as a group.
So how come Judge Einhorn decided on May 22, 2008 that these five did not constitute a criminal street gang?
(more…)